The Covel Network: Michael Covel | TurtleTrader | Trend Following || Contact

Archive for November, 2005

Homework Never Ends

“Michael, your book Trend Following is outstanding. I have 5 speaking dates in early 2006 and I will give all of the attendees some homework…telling them that [they] must read your book. I thought that homework would end when I got out of school, but I know that doing homework never ends…Thank you for the education. In addition to being a Market Timer I am now a Trend Follower. Your book is a must read for every investor. Well done.”
Jim Rohrbach
Founder and President
Investment Models, Inc.

New Cover Jacket

Here is the entire book jacket (PDF) for the new and expanded edition of Trend Following released this month.

New Edition of Trend Following Available

The New and Expanded Edition of Trend Following is now available. This edition builds off of the original released in April 2004.

The November 2005 New and Expanded Edition:

1. New Forward by Larry Hite
2. New Afterword
3. New Table of Contents
4. New Acknowledgements
5. New Cover (PDF)
6. Original edition 311 pages. New & expanded edition 420 pages.
7. Beyond new material in “red” listed in the Table of Contents, this edition has an additional 50 side margin quotes throughout.
8. Fixes all typos in the first few printings of original edition.
9. The first printing of Trend Following in April 2004 used a very thin paper. All other printings after used a thicker more durable paper. The new expanded edition for November 2005 uses the much thicker more durable paper also.

Endorsements (More)

“For my staff at Hite Capital, Michael Covel’s Trend Following is required reading.”
Larry Hite, CEO, Hite Capital Management

“A mandatory reference for anyone serious about alternative investments.”
Jon Sundt, President and CEO of Altegris

“Michael Covel does an excellent job of educating his readers about the little-known opportunities available to them through one of the proven best hedge fund strategies. This book is like gold to any smart investor.”
Christian Baha, CEO, Superfund

The new edition is available now online and offline at Barnes and Noble and Borders stores.

RealMoney.com?

From RealMoney.com comes this excerpt:

“Oh, there is one other number to be on the lookout for. That of course is Dow 11,000. With all the hoopla likely to accompany a move to this level, we should see a pretty good pullback follow the first pop to or through this big round number. Ultimately, Dow 11,000 will likely be taken out. But I look for the first attempt to fail and to be followed by a tradeable decline. Wednesday’s high just shy of 10,951 may have been close enough for the moment. A quick 40-point pullback to the 10,910 level followed in the final hour, as apparently there were too many bets already placed on an imminent assault on Dow 11,000. Whether it happens this week or next, odds are good the much heralded pop through Dow 11,000 will happen. But I suspect that when it does, rather than being the sign of a new bull leg beginning, it will be the sign of the last buyer buying.”

What are you supposed to do with this commentary? This stuff is all over the web. What in the world is the purpose of it?

Not All There

Feedback received:

Buffett has spent so much time being Soros’ puppet to notice people arent buying Coke, BUD, and soon PG+WMT, he wants to bet against america with soros’ whose only goal is to get political control………..sorry, i choose america…and therefore i boycott buffett products, i’ll miss WMT, but i and my family are loyal americans.”

If you think like this, you miss the point of making money in the markets. While I understand this gentleman is trying to promote some type of pro-American view…that kind of talk is silly. The world is global. While this guy is chasing conspiracy theories, the great traders “trade”.

Hedgestreet and Prediction Markets

An interesting article on Hedgestreet and a conference to be held on prediction markets on December 2, 2005.

Google Trend

Yes, I am sitting in Google (GOOG) too. The trend sure is nice. But as a trend follower, you always need to have an exit strategy.

Feedback on White Paper

Feedback on Blackstar Funds white paper posted yesterday:

“Hi Michael! Thank you for your informative blog - I read it every time you place a new entry. I particularly enjoyed your recent post titled “Trend Following on Stocks”. However, at the very end of the publication the author makes a trading slip. It’s what I call the ’stock split bias’. In the article the author ends by mentioning that they filtered stocks that traded below an absolute dollar figure of $15 - to filter out undesirable trades/stocks. While the logic seems sound on face value, in back testing it filters out stocks without taking into consideration the stock splits. As an example, take Microsoft. With its current stock split history it doesn’t trade above $15 until around mid 1997, however, back in 1997 Microsoft was actually trading around $120! Therefore, neglecting MSFT prior to 1997 because of its current stock split history would not accurately reflect the performance of the system back in 1997 (where it would have traded MSFT). Of course if the back-testing incorporated stock split data this problem could be circumvented, however, using absolute dollar figures on price should not be used in back-testing if incorporating stock splits cannot be used. Thanks for your time and I look forward to reading more great trend following material (loved your book too!). From an avid reader and trader, Ryan”

The author Cole Wilcox wrote me back to clarify:

“He is smart to recognize this, however if he re-reads Appendix 4 he will see that we have accounted for this by maintaining 2 sets of data. Our minimum price filter is based on the actual prices that hit the tape, not the split adjusted data.”

Trend Following on Stocks

Cole Wilcox and Eric Crittenden of Blackstar Funds, LLC authored a white paper titled Does Trend Following Work on Stocks? This paper is being released exclusively first on my collection of sites.

Q. How did you get started?
A. When I was 19 I got hired on by a brokerage firm without really knowing what to expect. I quickly realized that that a broker was a sales job that involved a lot more cold calling than critical thinking. I was much more interested in making investment decisions than sales calls so I focused my business on profitably trading a handful of client’s accounts and eventually my own account. This led to a good run during the technology bubble of the late 90’s. In February of 2000 I was fortunate enough to recognize that my trading success was mostly a function of market environment. My intuition said that the low hanging fruit had been picked. I mostly went to cash and began to return client capital. My business partner Eric Crittenden and I met in summer of 01′. I was interested in transforming from a discretionary trading approach to a more systematic and sustainable process. Eric had the experience and skills required to tackle this project. He had been working on the development of trading models and risk management systems for a proprietary trading firm. He educated me on topics such as computer programming, statistics & systematic risk management. We work well as a team because we have distinctly different skill sets of equal importance and share a common vision. This has led to a successful partnership that resulted in the founding of our firm Blackstar Funds.

Q. Tell me about Blackstar?
A. Blackstar Funds was founded in 2003 to develop a multi manager fund with a focus on investing with systematic trading managers in the equity, commodity & financial futures markets. Our initial business plan was able to attract venture capital & board membership from retired hedge fund manager Tom Basso (Market Wizard’s). During our research and construction of the fund we were not able to find equity managers who we felt were systematic enough to meet our investment criteria. This led us to ask the question: Why can’t we find a systematic equity trend following fund?

Q. What was the answer?
A. We asked a number of large CTA’s and fund managers why they had not developed an equity product. The answers ranged from ambivalence and not wanting to get distracted from their work in futures all the way to statements that it simply does not work on stocks. One multi billion dollar firm went as far as saying “there’s nothing there”. We took this as an opportunity to do our own empirical research on the topic which has led the publishing of our findings and seeding of the Blackstar Diversified Equity Fund.

Q. Why did your research paper focus on a long only portfolio?
A. We wanted to show apples to apples comparison of an equity trend following strategy vs. a stock market index. We felt that including short selling would have distorted the comparison. Another big factor to consider is that the expectancy on short selling stocks in severely stunted relative to long positions because you are capped at making a maximum gain of 100% on your best trades. Long positions have no cap and can make gains well in excess of 100%. While there may be merit in further research into short selling it fell outside the scope of the paper.

Q. Renaissance Technologies of Medallion Fund fame has generated a lot of press recently with the launch of a new systematic equity fund. Is your strategy similar to theirs?
A. Our multi manager portfolio is actually an investor in this new fund. Although their strategy is “black box” with limited transparency we feel their fund’s overall strategy is probably a closer cousin to systematic trading based on price and volatility than bottom up fundamental value investing. That being said, only Jim Simons and his research team know the exact answer.

Complex Chinese Jacket

The full high-resolution book jacket for the Complex Chinese version of Trend Following (8MG).

© 1996-2008 Michael Covel & TurtleTrader® | Trademark Notice | Subscribe (RSS) | Design by Forty | Contact Michael Covel