The Covel Network: Michael Covel | TurtleTrader | Trend Following || Contact

Archive for April, 2007

Leverage Fear

From the Wall Street Journal comes a familiar refrain today:

Hedge-fund manager John Paulson made $1 billion using a complex financial instrument to pump up a bet that the subprime-mortgage market would crater. The parent company of retail giant Sears made $74 million using a similar device to boost its wager that a basket of stocks would rise in value. Both were playing with leverage — the magical power that allows investors to make big investments without putting big money on the table. These days, they have lots of company. Thanks to advances in financial engineering, investors have never had so many different ways to make commitments that exceed their bankrolls. And never before has leverage wormed its way into so many nooks of the financial world. We’re living on planet leverage, and regulators and market gurus are growing nervous. How did this happen? For starters, hedge funds and leveraged-buyout funds have proliferated. They’re pioneers in boosting returns using borrowed money, the most traditional form of leverage. Also, investment banks are pumping out newfangled leveraging tools such as derivatives, complex securities that allow hedge funds and other investors to add leverage without borrowing money.

Whole article.

Covel Podcasts

A reminder to new readers, you can find my regular podcasts here.

How Do You Define Risky?

A while back I was interviewed by reporter Kambiz Foroohar for an article he was working on. I will go back and check my notes for more detail, but I remember telling him that if Christopher Cox and the SEC were ok with mutual funds selling NASDAQ index funds, which we all remember dropping -77% during the last market bubble pop, then the idea that average investors should be turned away from hedge fund opportunities (with track records that don’t come close to -77%) by the GOVERNMENT was contradictory and frankly bogus. I also implored this reporter to address the word “risky” - what in the world does it mean in the government’s eyes? I still don’t know.

The government can’t on one hand sanction mutual fund strategies that we already know can go down to zero, but then turn around and keep people away from hedge fund opportunities that have actually assembled track records of note and make money. That doesn’t even address the issue of the average Joe having his pension monies put into hedge funds anyway - just without his knowledge by the institutional manager who controls his retirement future.

Here is the article in question where my comments did not make the final cut. The article features Christian Baha of Superfund.

The Fear Is Palpable

This article puts “fear” front and center:

All the World’s a Bubble
By Brett Arends
http://www.thestreet.com/funds/followmoney/10353243.html

How high will the Dow go? 15,000? 20,000?

How about 36,000?

While euphoria sweeps stock markets here and worldwide, there are at least a few voices of dissent.

One, unsurprisingly, is legendary value investor Jeremy Grantham — the man Dick Cheney, plus a lot of other rich people, trusts with his money. Grantham, chairman of Boston firm Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo, has been a voice of caution for years. But he has upped his concerns in his latest letter to shareholders. Grantham says we are now seeing the first worldwide bubble in history covering all asset classes.

Everything is in bubble territory, he says.

Everything.

“From Indian antiquities to modern Chinese art,” he wrote in a letter to clients this week following a six-week world tour, “from land in Panama to Mayfair; from forestry, infrastructure and the junkiest bonds to mundane blue chips; it’s bubble time!”

“Everyone, everywhere is reinforcing one another,” he wrote. “Wherever you travel you will hear it confirmed that ‘they don’t make any more land,’ and that ‘with these growth rates and low interest rates, equity markets must keep rising,’ and ‘private equity will continue to drive the markets.’ ”

As Grantham points out, a bubble needs two things: excellent fundamentals and easy money.

“The mechanism is surprisingly simple,” he wrote. “Perfect conditions create very strong ‘animal spirits,’ reflected statistically in a low risk premium. Widely available cheap credit offers investors the opportunity to act on their optimism.”

And it becomes self-sustaining. “The more leverage you take, the better you do; the better you do, the more leverage you take. A critical part of a bubble is the reinforcement you get for your very optimistic view from those around you.”

It’s something to think about the next time you hear someone tell you that the stock market will keep rising simply because the world economy is doing so well. That would make sense only if we were paying a constant price for each unit of world GDP, instead of higher and higher prices for one slice of that GDP — equity.

Grantham concludes that every asset class is expensive today compared with historic averages and compared with the cost of replacing it. By his calculations, the only assets likely to beat inflation by any significant margin if you hold them for the next seven years are managed timber, “high-quality” U.S. stocks, and bonds.

As noted in this column several weeks ago, Grantham’s U.S. “high-quality” stocks include Home Depot (HD) , Merck (MRK) , Wal-Mart (WMT) , AT&T (T) , Pfizer (PFE) , Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) , Exxon Mobil (XOM) , UnitedHealth (UNH) , Verizon (VZ) and Lowe’s (LOW) .

“The bursting of [this] bubble will be across all countries and all assets, with the probable exception of high-grade bonds,” Grantham warned. “Since no similar global event has occurred before, the stresses to the system are likely to be unexpected. All of this is likely to depress confidence and lower economic activity.”

Ouch.

Grantham sees two big potential catalysts that might turn this bull market into a bear: a surge in inflation, leading to higher interest rates, and a squeeze on profit margins, which are currently running way above long-term averages.

As for timing, he concedes that’s impossible to predict. But here’s the kicker: Even Grantham thinks you probably need to be bullish right now. The reason? Most bubbles, he notes, go through a short but dramatic “exponential phase” just before they burst. Like Japan in 1989 or the Internet in early 2000.

“My colleagues,” wrote Grantham, “suggest that this global bubble has not yet had this phase and perhaps they are right. … In which case, pessimists or conservatives will take considerably more pain.”

Statistics and Gun Control Debate

WSJ writer Carl Bialik makes good points about the complete picture frequently going missing in the gun control debate.

Hedge Funds & Politics: Paul Tudor Jones Hedges the Presidential Election

John Carney writes:

Paul Tudor Jones II’s is hedging his political bets. He donated to Republican Rudy Giuliani’s presidential “exploratory committee” (apparently that’s political speak for the campaign before the campaign). And next month he’s holding a big fund raiser for Democratic nomination hopeful Barack Obama, the New York Observer’s Politicker blog notes…The event will be held at Jones’ oceanfront Greenwich mansion, which reportedly sits on top of a 25-car garage. More than 500 guests are expected to attend. The Politicker implies that Jones may have dumped Giuliani in keeping with his reputation for getting out of losing investment positions. We’re not so sure. While we’re not exactly experts in presidential politics here at DealBreaker, it seems to us that this is not so much a strike against Rudy as much as Hillary. She’s supposed to be the candidate with all the pull on Wall Street (wife of Bill Clinton, connected to Citigroup’s Robert Rubin) and her position as a senator from New York, should give her connections to nearby Greenwich, Connecticut’s hedge fund money. But Obama has been cleaning her clock when it comes to donations from the world of finance. And now he can add PTJII to the list.

Black Swans and Virginia Tech

A recent op-ed in the LA Times examines Black Swans and Virginia Tech (PDF). An excerpt:

Efforts to explain the Virginia Tech massacre perfectly illustrate one of the central points of an idiosyncratically brilliant new book by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable.” When completely caught out by some random event, we humans are wonderfully good at retrospectively predicting it. In reality, however, Cho was what Taleb calls a “black swan.”

David Harding of Winton Capital

I had the opportunity to interview David Harding in his London office a while back. He is one helluva trader:

The Jock Exchange

The Jock Exchange article (PDF) by Michael Lewis is a good view of the future of “markets”.

Nassim Taleb and the Black Swan: A Retrospective, by Dave “Surf” Goodboy

A first hand account about Nassim Taleb’s new book from Dave Goodboy.

© 1996-2008 Michael Covel & TurtleTrader® | Trademark Notice | Subscribe (RSS) | Design by Forty | Contact Michael Covel