Trading mentor Van Tharp once stated:

Perhaps the greatest secret to top trading and investing success is appropriate money management. I call it a ’secret’ because few people seem to understand it, including many people who•ve written books on the topic. Some people call it risk control, others call it I diversification, and still others call it how to ‘wisely’ invest your money. However, the money management that is the key to top trading and investing simply refers to the algorithm that tells you ‘how much’ with respect to any particular position in the market.

He added:

John was a little shell-shocked over what had happened in the market over the last three days — he’d lost 70% of his account value. He was shaken, but still convinced that he could make the money back! After all, he had been up almost 200% before the market withered him down, He still had $4,500 left in his account. What advice would you give John? Your advice should be, “get out of the market immediately. You don’t have enough money to trade speculatively.” However, the average person is usually trying to make a big killing in the market, thinking that he or she can turn a $5,000 to $10,000 account into a million dollars in less than a year. While this sort of feat is possible, the chances of ruin for anyone who attempts it is almost certain.

I have been helping clients with these very issues in my trading courses for over a decade.

William Eckhardt (see: “The Complete TurtleTrader“), in attempting to get people to see the flaws in some trading strategies, once offered:

A price chart is an attempt to model relevant aspects of price change. Price change is not linear displacement, whether vertical, horizontal or oblique. Nonetheless, price change can be represented as vertical displacement and time elapsed as horizontal displacement. Such a model, however, invariably supports relationships that does not correspond to anything in the original process. The angular inclination of a trend on a price chart is a visually striking feature of this representation. Such angles have no intrinsic meaning for the price series, but this is one of the many factors (along with our facility for pattern recognition and wishful thinking) that contributes to our interpreting more from price charts than rigorous testing reveals is there.

Let me break down some of what Eckhardt is driving at. For example, new traders always talk of charts. Charts, charts, charts. Rarely do they talk of price. Many new traders think they are trading the “chart” when in reality if they want to be a great trend follower they should trade “price”. Eckhardt, in his best academic jargon, was basically saying, “don’t look for patterns where there are none!” Meaning if you are looking for angles embedded in a price chart for some predictive value or if you are developing some other arcane analysis, stop. The three best indicators? Price, price and price!

I will be offering some limited time only discounts for the December holidays. Make sure to connect with me on Facebook for all the details. What’s coming? There will be complimentary Market Wizard DVD giveaways and a significant price break off of my $1897 trading course for a limited number of first time clients.

How to find out and take advantage of these offers? Join me on Facebook.

A young guy from the U.K. has been writing me this morning. He has been making a case for why Buffett is the best investor ever. I have said, “Sure up until his bailouts and sweetheart government daddies helped save him in the Fall of 2008. If not, he was toast.” The young guy responded:

As regards the bailout, to be frank, if there wasn’t a bailout last year, it wouldn’t have been just BRK that went down the tubes - it would have been the entire global economic system. The disintegration of the banking system = no more credit = extreme deflation. Dunn Capital Management and every other business wouldn’t have been able to get short-term credit to pay its employees and suppliers. Asset prices would have gone into the abyss. If you think that trend followers would have made money in such conditions, remember that (a.) the rule of law and the enforceability of legal claims on assets may well have broken down, leading to civil disorder (b.) markets may well have failed to function, (c.) there would be no access to assets held by prime brokers, because they’d have gone down with the banks (see LEH). Basically anyone without tinned food and a log cabin in Montana would have lost under such a situation. BRK with its oodles of cash and AAA credit rating would have been one of the last to fail. My point is that you have to disassociate the investor and his record from the company - if for some reason Dunn failed under such a scenario, it wouldn’t reflect on Dunn as an investor, because we are talking about an event that has nothing to do with his skill as an investor. So, yes, maybe Buffett did manipulate the system to his advantage, but would we all honestly rather he hadn’t? Personally, I think this argument is rather overdone - the Fed and Treasury knew what happened in 1929, and there is no way, Buffett or not, they were going to let all the banks fail. I believe it is possible to replicate Buffett’s strategy - or at least its core - as much as it is any trend follower - buy companies with high free cash flow, strong franchises, little debt, during market crises when the P/E comes down below 15 or 20.

Bollocks. 100% bollocks. This is how the college text books will be rewritten to continue to salute “value” investing. They tell us the system would have crashed, but all we know now for sure is that the likes of Buffett and GS were saved. That is not a worthy investment strategy to follow.

This is still one of my coolest purchases:

More.

I received an email today with the subject heading of:

The Greatest Trade Ever: The Behind-the-Scenes Story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History by George Zuckerman (it is a book)

The email said:

This guy made like $24B in two years. More than all the combined profits of all the trend followers in history. 100% based on the fundamentals. You’d gain even more credibility if you acknowledged that other strategies besides trend following make money.

This is quite possibly one of the most ignorant emails I have ever received. This emailer finds one guy who bet the ranch and won — a strategy that no one else has ever replicated — and that is proof positive of what? The great thing about trend following: There is NOT just one practitioner who made $24B. Don’t get me wrong I salute John Paulson and his brilliance to figure out this great trade as it is the stuff of legends, but trend followers are not about one trade. In looking into Paulson I found this note about his success at Portfolio.com:

Left unexamined is the uncomfortable moral dimension of Paulson’s achievement. If he saw all of this coming, was it right for him to keep his own counsel, quietly trading while the financial system melted down? Do traders who figure out a way to profit from our misery deserve our contempt or our admiration, however grudging?

Paulson deserves admiration. Period. If you hate Paulson’s success, you are a punk.