Talent is overrated. High I.Q. guarantees nothing in trading.

Great traders are not born lucky or talented. The right education, information & dedicated practice equal success. We teach trading systems for stocks, futures, FX, ETFs & commodities designed with one goal: delivering the chance to make the big money for all traders in all countries.

Sign up for a FREE

Trend Following DVD

Free Newsletter

Our e-letter; 15,000+ readers!


Introduction

Trading Courses

TurtleTrader Book

Trend Following Book

Our Friends

Archive for the ‘Trend Following’ Category

Systematic Trading Diversification Done Right

Jason Russell and Nicholas Markos of Acorn Global Investments Inc. offer good insights into systematic trend following trading (PDF).

Nicholas Darvas: Trend Trader

From a Time Magazine article in 1959:

Darvas places his buy orders for levels that he considers breakout points on the upside. At the same time, he places a stop-loss sell order just below his buy order, so that if the stock does not move straight up after he buys, he will be sold out and his loss cut. “I have no ego in the stock market,” he says. “If I make a mistake I admit it immediately and get out fast.” Darvas thinks his system is the height of conservatism. Says he: “If you could play roulette with the assurance that whenever you bet $100 you could get out for $98 if you lost your bet, wouldn’t you call that good odds?” If he has a big profit in a stock, he puts the stop-loss order just below the level at which a sliding stock should meet support. He bought Universal Controls at 18, sold it at 83 on the way down after it had hit 102. “I never bought a stock at the low or sold one at the high in my life,” says Darvas. “I am satisfied to be along for most of the ride.”

I can’t recall the last time the financial press reported that a 1959 Time Magazine article might actually be good for one’s portfolio health.

Pablo Picasso on What Is Important

Pablo Picasso once said:

“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.”

I saw that today for the first time. Made me pause because I agree 100%! Let’s face it, it used to be more about having the right strategy and then hopefully making money. Today? Trading and investing has become a technological “math-turbation” marathon of red lights, green lights and six monitors on your desk:

“Do you have the latest software?” Do I need this indicator?” “How are your candlesticks plotted?”

Before digging in…let me say that this subject is nuanced.

Larry Hite, a prominent trend follower, once said that a computer can’t get up on the wrong side of the bed in the morning, which is why he relied on computers for decision-making:

“If your boyfriend or girlfriend breaks up with you, you’ll feel one way; if you get engaged, you’ll feel another way.”

But it’s more than just that.

Hite went on to say he would much rather have one real smart guy working on a lone Macintosh than a team of well-paid timekeepers with an army of supercomputers. At the same time, however, Hite was adamant that the real key to using computers successfully was the thinking that went into the computer code. When someone asked why even go the computer route if people power was so important. Hite responded:

“[B]ecause it works, it’s countable and replicable. I’m a great fan of the scientific method. And the other things are not scientific. If I give you the algorithms, you should be able to get the same results I did. That to me means a great deal.”

However, there are challenges that go along with PC-based trading. Computer technology can be easily used to over optimize or curve-fit a trading system and produce a system that looks good — on paper. By testing thousands of possibilities, anyone can create a system that works in theory as [Donchian student] Barbara Dixon warned:

“When designing a system, I believe it’s important to construct a set of rules which fit more like a mitten than like a glove. On the one hand, markets move in trends, but on the other hand, past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. If you design a set of rules which fit the curve of your test data too perfectly, you run an enormous risk that it will fizzle under different future conditions.”

However, you are in serious trouble if all you think you need is the latest hardware and software to succeed at trading. Dixon adds:

“Contemporary databases, software, and hardware allow system developers to test thousands of ideas almost instantaneously. I caution these people about the perils of curve fitting. I urge them to remember that one of their primary goals is to achieve discipline which will enable them to earn profits. With so many great tools it’s easy to change or modify a system and to develop indicators rather than rules, but is it always wise.”

It is difficult not to get caught up in the hype of computer programs for trading. You can go out and spend several thousand dollars to purchase fancy charting software that makes you feel like you are the president and sole trader of your own hedge fund. What were trend followers doing before they had PCs? When describing his early trading successes John W. Henry made clear the key was philosophy, not technology:

“In those days, there were no personal computers beyond the Apple. There were few, if any, flexible software packages available. These machines, far from being the ubiquitous tool seen everywhere in the world of finance and the world at large today, were the province of computer nerds…I set out to design a system for trading…”

One of Henry’s employees years earlier elaborated:

“Originally all of our testing was done mechanically with pencil and graph that turned into lotus spreadsheets, which was still used extensively in a lot of our day to day work. With the advent of some of these new modeling systems like system writer, day trader and some of the other things, we’ve been able to model some of our systems on these products. Mostly just to back test what we already knew, that trend following works.”

Trader Tom Basso’s experience was also noteworthy:

“You’ll find that the more you’re computerized, the more markets you’ll be able to handle. Computers leverage your time if you know how to use them.

Trend following grandfather Richard Donchian’s timeless observations should likewise cause new traders to pause:

“If you trade on a definite trend following loss limiting-method, you can [trade] without taking a great deal of time from your regular business day. Since action is taken only when certain evidence is registered, you can spend a minute or two per [market] in the evening checking up on whether action-taking evidence is apparent, and then in one telephone call in the morning place or change any orders in accord with what is indicated. [Furthermore] a definite method, which at all times includes precise criteria for closing out one’s losing trades promptly, avoids…emotionally unnerving indecision.”

Of course to reach the ‘minute or two’ Donchian refers to takes preparation time. I am not minimizing the work and effort needed to succeed, but I am quoting him as great insight and motivation.

At the end of the day the rationales on this page are why clients have trusted my firm for over a decade to help with their educational needs.

One last thing. I mentioned “six monitors on your desk.” Why is it that the great trend followers have never done that, but so many new traders think it is important? Food for thought.

Bottom line: this should NOT be what you are doing all day!

Note: Some content from this post is from my book “Trend Following.” And shout to Ritholtz for desk image.

Trends Abound

A friend, and fund manager Jason Russell writes:

“Trends are everywhere - weather, sports, fashion, food, entertainment, health, science and politics. Some trends are long, some are short. They come and they go as they always have and always will. Life and business both thrive on identifying, following and serving trends. Market prices for metals, currencies, energies or bonds are no different. Over any given time horizon, prices go up, down or sideways. It is no more complex than that.”

Veteran Feedback

Feedback in from a reader:

Dear Michael, I just finished ‘The Complete TurtleTrader‘ and ‘Trend Following‘. I want to congratulate you on your efforts. I have been on Wall Street for 27 years: 14 with Goldman Sachs, 3 with Lehman and 10 as a private investor. I was professionally ‘born and raised’ in the FX business. I started on the floor of the COMEX as a silver clerk..I ran the [name] FX business in [name] for 4 years and then ran global FX sales for [name] between London and NY. I have ALWAYS been a ‘price based’ trader. I was best described as “opportunistic, discretionary”.

In [date] I sat next to Stan Druckenmiller at a party for George Soros. Just trying to make conversation, I looked up at Stan (he is very tall) and said: “So, Stan, tell me about your investment process?.” He looked at me and said, “I bet 8% to make 25% and try and front run the mutual funds (less than $1 trillion in assets back then…and that was probably INCLUDING money markets!)!”

A few years ago, I asked myself a question: Would it be possible for me, in a dark room with absolutely zero information, to SEE some of the dramatically expanding algorithmic activity across global financial markets? I was HIGHLY familiar with all of the CTA’s. All of them had been clients. I have been to every office (most of the majors). While I had never USED a systematic approach to my trading, I absolutely understood the process. One of the Paul Jones quotes that you do NOT have in your book:

“Do the trade that makes you PUKE.”

I wanted to see if I could re-create the ability to have a MUCH BETTER than average chance of knowing when the largest ‘bulb’ of passive trend following AUM was coming…the PRICE and the TIME.

I have created a hybrid system that allows me to constantly track a ‘trend following’ portfolio and CRITICALLY know where the STOPS are. Main Point: I absolutely know that I know nothing. BUT, I know a lot about the ‘process of trading’, both mechanically and emotionally. I have found that knowing ahead of time where there is a high probability of “Typical Stop Loss Related Activity” is a VERY useful tool.

I have really enjoyed your work and that is with a FULL CAREER behind me in the subject. Once again, congratulations on your successes and I would love to speak with you. All the best, [name]

Thanks. Let’s chat.

Ron Lieber Needs to See My Film “Broke: The New American Dream”

I just read a great article. Ron Lieber of The New York Times writes:

“Financial bubbles are a way of life now. They can upend your industry, send your portfolio into spasms and leave you with whiplash. And then, once you’ve recovered, the next one will hit.”

Lieber adds:

“How do you identify the next thing that will pop? Is it China? Or Greece? Or Treasury bonds? It is difficult to predict and make the right defensive (or offensive) moves at the correct moment to save or make money.”

Lieber adds:

“…take a hard look at how much you should rely on promises from the government. Social Security and Medicare may not fit the traditional definition of bubbles, but [they are].”

Lieber adds:

“One of the few things you can predict about bubbles is that they will test your conviction on where you sit along the fear-greed continuum. And once they pop, you’ll know a bit more about how your mind works than you did before.”

Lieber adds:

“So rather than trying to predict the number and type of bubbles, it may make more sense to look inward when trying to predict the future. People…talk about how we all know that inflation is going to explode next year…we don’t all know that. We don’t know anything. But we can know something about our own lives, and there is a person we can talk to about that. A person in the mirror.”

I just emailed him to say that he needs to see “Broke.” Others should help him along! Here is his contact!

The Dead Hand of Safe Bets

Today, the TV hit me with an ad playing in the background. All I heard was:

“If you are like most your retirement dreams have seen better days.”

If I had a gun at the moment, I would have shot my the screen. Not because I am worried about retirement, but because of the weenie culture that is being cultivated by the media. However, I guess that is not surprising when you consider this excerpt from The New York Times:

“…today’s children do grow up with soccer leagues and spelling bees where everyone gets a prize. On some playgrounds dodge ball is deemed too traumatic to the dodging-impaired. Some parents consider musical chairs dangerously exclusionary. Children are constantly feted for accomplishments that used to be routine. They may not all be honored at a fourth-grade graduation ceremony - the event in the movie that inspires Mr. Incredible’s complaint about mediocrity - but they all hear the mantra recited by Dash’s sister in response to his ambitions. “Everyone’s special, Dash,” she says. “Which is another way of saying no one is,” he replies. The villain, Syndrome, makes the same point when he envisions empowering the masses with his inventions. “Everybody will be super, which means no one will be,” he says, gleeful that he will finally have revenge on Mr. Incredible for snubbing him during his childhood.”

Everyone wants it easy.

But as Allan Sloan of Newsweek once penned, it doesn’t work that way:

“The message here: unpleasant as it is, let’s admit that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. It’s an up-and-down world; be prepared to take the occasional lump. In the markets, as in life, there’s no such thing as return without risk.”

Banning dodge ball and singing Kumbaya are not a path to success. Group hugs will not generate excellence. While American Idol’s Paula Abdul reflects the warm and fuzzy self-empowerment approach to life it is Simon Cowell who we can really learn from. The path to greatness starts by calling it like it is.

Unfortunately, the average investor to his or her detriment is stubbornly fixated on the security of a ‘nanny’ existence allowing others (mostly media and brokers) to define financial success as: “Take what the average is and be happy you poor sap!” Finding out how great traders do it is usually ignored.

And no doubt for average investors the great trend traders have always been shrouded in secrecy. This mystery has propagated because typical portrayals label super earners as genetic freaks, magicians, charlatans or pedigreed investment bankers. The truth? They are almost all self-starter entrepreneurs who through concentration, drive, and fierce independent streaks, have cultivated their knowledge of how to mint money and achieved tremendous success.

That should be good news. For today, more so than ever, with so much uncertainty, people are scared. They don’t know what steps to take with their money and many just want to hide it under a mattress. The world appears more dangerous than it’s ever been and paralysis seems like a good option to many. And while it might appear harder than ever to make money investing and trading, that’’s not the case. The world is actually the same as it always has been unpredictable — which is good or bad depending on your vantage.

Sadly, though millions still vicariously follow Warren Buffett for ideas on when to enter and exit the market or for stocks to buy. Others follow CNBC for stock tips and breaking news looking for ideas. Others treat market gurus as prophets and still others read nonstop columns and blogs trying to divine what to do with their money. When the TV people say its time to buy Exxon or dump Apple, many follow that random advice blindly.

This doesn’t work if you want the chance to make money. If you’re worried about an uncertain future (something every investor should be) the ’secret’ is not to focus on which stocks to buy or sell, but instead to focus on ‘risk.’ Learning how to manage, control and use risk is the most important technique any trader can know.

However, it is hard. People are smacked daily with noise. For example, I pose the questions: Why do people listen to Jim Cramer on a regular basis? Why should anyone pay attention to him? Are they thinking, ‘Maybe Cramer will help me win the millions in the stock market?’ Or, ‘Maybe he’s right in recommending Google and I can make a killing?’ Or, are people just too sheep-like and gullible to see through the gurus?

The Cramer audience doesn’t understand that following his advice won’t make them a winner. In fact, the odds of winning and losing in the long run by following any talking head’s advice are astronomically bad. Think of it this way: Cramer comes on and says buy ‘XYZ’. Isn’t he saying that to the whole world? Not much of an exclusive. Worse yet, if you allow yourself to buy on Cramer’s tips, does he call you when its time to sell? Or are you just assuming when Cramer says ‘buy’ that the stock will go up forever and you’ll never ’sell’? And even if you could answer these questions Cramer leaves the most important aspect of making money out. He never tells you how to use, manage, and control risk to your advantage.

While Cramer keeps talk about risk to a whisper, those who know the subject well are the real winners. ‘Risk’ is behind the greatest hedge fund fortunes, the biggest mansions in Palm Beach, Fla. and Greenwich, Conn. Those who used risk management to make millions (and in many cases billions) didn’t get that way writing down television guru’s stock picks every night. They made their money by asking questions like: ‘What can I win?’ ‘What can I lose?’ ‘What are the probabilities of each outcome?’ They don’t waste time with ‘tips’ or the supposed ‘right time to buy’.

No clear understanding of risk or knowledge of risk management? You will lose over the long run. Why? We all have limited money that’s why. Bottom line if we don’t know how to manage our losses, we won’t have any money to play the game to make more. Consider wisdom from a famed trader about ‘risk’:

“Risk is the possibility of loss. That is, if we own some stock, and there is a possibility of a price decline, we are at risk. The stock is not the risk, nor is the loss the risk. The possibility of loss is the risk. As long as we own the stock, we are at risk. The only way to control the risk is to buy or sell stock. In the matter of owning stocks, and aiming for profit, risk is fundamentally unavoidable and the best we can do is to manage the risk. To manage is to direct and control. Risk management is to direct and control the possibility of loss. The activities of a risk manager are to measure risk and to increase and decrease risk by buying and selling stock.”

Maybe you assume you get ‘risk’ already, but my 14 years of experience covering and writing about top traders says most people don’t have a clue. Consider how important risk management is to some of the top market wizards, the top traders who make millions (if not billions):

“Throughout my financial career, I have continually witnessed examples of other people that I have known being ruined by a failure to respect risk. If you don’t take a hard look at risk, it will take you.”
Larry Hite

“Frankly, I don’t see markets; I see risks, rewards, and money.”
Larry Hite

“If I have positions going against me, I get right out; if they are going for me, I keep them… Risk control is the most important thing in trading. If you have a losing position that is making you uncomfortable, the solution is very simple: Get out, because you can always get back in.”
Paul Tudor Jones

“Don’t focus on making money; focus on protecting what you have.”
Paul Tudor Jones

“You can give anyone the best tools in the world and if they don’t use them with good money management, they will not make money in the markets. We’re convinced that a person could make a profit simply by buying and selling the markets according to the dart board if they followed all the right things as far as money management is concerned.”
Welles Wilder

“If you have an approach that makes money, then money management can make the difference between success and failure…I try to be conservative in my risk management. I want to make sure I’ll be around to play tomorrow. Risk control is essential.”
Monroe Trout

I have sat down with many of the great traders. In their offices, in their homes, over dinner, on multiple continents — like a broken record they all lead with risk as their topic number one when it comes to making money.

Risk management can go by different names: asset allocation, position sizing, portfolio heat, portfolio sizing, size management, money management and bet size selection. ‘Bet’ is probably not a word most people associate with managing risk, but every ‘bet’ (read: trade or investment) we take involves the decision to risk something of value for an uncertain prospect of gain in the future. Placing winning bets over the long run requires innumerable decisions in the face of innumerable trade-offs — but it can be done.

The great traders have learned how to win in volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environments (the environments the market is in most of the time) because they understand betting (read: risk management). Play poker in Vegas and you have a fighting chance. Play roulette and over time you will continually lose. Wall Street’s top earners trade like poker players by always knowing the odds and their ‘edge’ (a simple example of managing risk). They bet the ranch when the odds are in their favor and they walk away when the odds are bad.

What happens if you don’t follow risk management rules? That is one of the subjects covered in my second book “The Complete TurtleTrader.” How can some with great rules do well and others with the same rules do bad? I address it head on in my book — from Richard Dennis’s ups and downs, to Turtle busts, to great Turtles and great second-generation Turtles providing timeless winning lessons — it’s all there.

Bottom line, no one gave me permission to educate clients on these subjects. I seized the education mantle. There was a vacuum, and seizing it gave credibility. It opened doors. Why does a London based hedge fund with billions under management make my first book mandatory reading, but refuse all on the record interviews with me? Why did one hedge fund not mentioned in my first book buy 3000 copies? Why did another not mentioned buy 1000 copies? Why did so many top traders speak with me to begin with?

They know I do the work. They I know the write truth. However, finding the truth, digging it up and putting into digestible form takes time, energy and many Aha! moments — or said another way a jolt of electricity to the brain. One of those jolts for me occurred in 2005 upon learning of the existence of a documentary profiling legendary trader Paul Tudor Jones. Jones made $500 million in 2005, so seeing him in action nearly twenty years before was a must.

My gut said that this out of print documentary would provide serious insights, but it was tough to find. Ebay, Amazon, etc. were dead ends. When it was located my intuition was dead on. Once you start watching, you can’t stop.

The March 1987 documentary was made when Jones was 32 with 22 employees and only $125 million under management. Today he has 300 employees and $15 billion under management. His right hand man at the time, also featured in the documentary, was Peter Borish. He was 27.

This documentary revealed a raw side behind the scenes. Jones and Borish were squarely in the middle of a game with one goal: to get very rich. Borish knew there were no shortcuts:

“I am graded instantly through the harshest teacher in the world — the market. There is no curve. I can’t say, ‘boy I was out late last night and everybody else was in the class was at a pep rally for the football game and I only got a 70, but that was the highest in the class so I still got an A.’ It doesn’t work that way in the market.”

Jones knew all about the non-existent grading ‘curve’. In one scene at his Chesapeake Bay home, he nurses a Budweiser while trading Asian markets late at night. You could hear the passion in his voice when he described what it feels like to hit the baseball hard:

“Whether you are making 100% rate of return on $10,000 or $100,000,000, it doesn’t make any difference. Right? If you complete 78% of your passes, it would be nice to be in the NFL. If you are in college, high school or elementary school, I am sure the thrill is just as great.”

Here is a market athlete competing in the biggest game of all and telling it like it is — that’s rare. Later Jones is skiing in Gstaad, Switzerland. Ray Bans perched on his head. Thoughts of first boss, the famed cotton speculator Eli Tullis, were still fresh:

“The first year I did nothing but get his coffee. I was learning by osmosis. I was a glorified secretary, which is fine because I was soaking in everything, every move that he made and every step that he took.”

Jones was especially juiced about a memorable experience with Tullis that sounded eerily similar to a young Richard Dennis (one of Jones’ major inspirations):

“He sat there right there in the middle of getting absolutely decimated across the board in these commodities with the most beautiful smile, the most incredibly elegant poise and stylish composure and just had a wonderful little chat with me for 45 minutes to an hour. I was just overwhelmed that anyone could be that strong.”

Tullis’ poise under pressure changed Jones’ perspective. It inspired him. It taught him. If you want to end up with a $2 billion dollar net worth, which is what Jones is worth today, a ‘learn from someone else’ attitude is mission critical. Putting your ego aside admitting you don’t know it all isn’t easy, but it’s the mindset of real winners.

Long before I ever saw that film, I had become friends with Borish, whom I first met in the mid-nineties. Then years later, in 2004, after my first book ‘Trend Following‘ had come out, we sat down over lunch at the Old Ebbitt Grill in Washington, D.C. Borish liked ‘Trend Following’, but he was urging a sequel (this was before my Turtle book was on the drawing board) and in hindsight I can see that he was clearly seeing years ahead to the fall of October 2008.

However, back in 2004 a few weeks later after our initial meeting (as a guest of his at an 1986 World Champion Mets charity auction) Borish lamented that so many people were only considering making money as markets rise (’long only’). He knew better. He knew how billionaires made the big money. As a founding member, and still on the Board of Directors, for the Robin Hood Foundation, many of the great traders are his friends.

Borish inspired me to pick up the phone and reach out to top traders on late 2004 and early 2005. I called hedge fund after hedge fund, great trader after great trader. Almost all agreed to talk. All had read my first book. They were collectively trading over $10 billion dollars. The confidence from their acceptance, from their desire to sit down with me, reinforced my conviction that I was asking the right questions. Once again, this all stemmed from my first book ‘Trend Following‘.

One final reminder, about trend following and risk management, comes from David Harding (in my film). Harding has been one of the top trend followers for decades and he puts it succinctly:

“We trade everything using trend-following systems, and it works.”

Agreed.

A fun side note: I almost named my film ‘Panicky Sheep.’ Why? On a trip back from Tokyo to Washington, DC. I watched Monty Python’s Terry Gilliam, the noted film director, recount a phrase he had heard from famed author Hunter S. Thompson. Thompson lamented that America had become a land of panicky sheep. The phrase was loaded, but deadly accurate. It was also a sad commentary. That phrase galvanized me as we put together my film ‘Broke‘ and of course inspired my visit to a sheep farm.

Trend Following

Covel's Bestseller

'Broke' on DVD

Covel's Documentary

TurtleTrader

Inside Turtle Story

We passionately teach the lessons of the great traders who have made their trend following fortunes over the last four decades. More info on seminars and consulting.

Home Trading Courses

8 DVDs / 7 CDs

  • DVDs, CDs & text!
  • Personal support!

6 DVDs / 6 CDs

  • DVDs, CDs & text!
  • Personal support!

3 DVDs / 6 CDs

  • DVDs, CDs & text!
  • Personal support!

Market Wizard Interviews by Michael Covel


  • Jim Rogers on the Fed con.

  • Market Wizard Larry Hite discusses dating odds.

  • Poker pro Howard Lederer on poker & trading the markets.

  • Trader Salem Abraham talks about the unexpected.

Site Design: